This idea struck me yesterday, but I could only get on today, to blog this:
1. When one nominates candidates to represent a particular state or district in a country, is it fair to the voters in the cases when there are only two contenders, and one is rejected due to technical errors during the nomination, to allow the one and only contender left to have a walk-through? Or should the particular district or state wait for a few months for another contender to come up and therefore challenge the current one? Would that be fairer to the constituents? That would keep them on their toes as oppose to becoming complacent. Bear in mind of course that their is no perfect fairness in elections, especially in a system where the supposed majority (whose votes are not spoilt) are the voice for all.
2. We have seen a dip in the way education is being implemented worldwide, which is a disgrace. How do we overcome this?
3. How well do you think theories work in providing solutions to practical problems?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment