Hullaboo

It has been almost a week since I last blogged. In fact, it is a week. Many things have happened since, including one of the most relaxing weekend ever, which means not having to run errands or do work, other than picking up some stuff on the way out, renewing some library books and doing some grocery shopping ( ok, a bit of errands but nothing tough). It is also one weekend spent on loading up the calories so I am going to spend this week, and the followings ones, unloading them. Through regular exercise of course.

Due to my heavy work load last week, I wasn't able to go anywhere really much. However, I succeeded in reading through some essays by a group of Englightenment scholars, talking about subjects as wide ranging and as familiar today as civil liberties, governments, rights of (wo)men, politics etc. One realises from reading ppl like Rousseau, Voltaire, Herder, Priestley et al, that ideas and ideals haven't changed much (though Voltaire made boo boos when talking bout the science of anatomy by saying that a negro (black be the PC word) innards differ from that of the white men. However, the gaffe was more funny than insulting, and basically, he was trying, in that particular essay (title I have forgotten since I returned the book) that all men are as good and as bad as the next person and that it is mostly the system they live in that render them bad.

Best way to begin reading these people is to begin by looking at anthologies compiled by scholars of today. That way, you get a feel of each writer before endeavouring to explore them further. I wish I have had the time to finish up that particular anthology (it was from the Cambridge Series) and write a longer critique on the essays by doing a comparison with some of today's political systems. I will do that in due course, but I am too busy with work and various projects right now.

This particular anthology (called keyword search "Enlightenment", sorry, forgot the full title) was targetted at introductory courses in political thought, history and all related fields. It is by reading works like this that I realise how "uneducated" I am, despite spending 4 years doing undergraduate in university , taking my sweet time to learn as many subjects inside and outside my field (which was Physics) as I possibly could, while having the time to absorb everything. Of course, 3 years was not enough for a person as unfocussed as I was, though a majority of my coursemates who went in together with me (from Physics) had graduated by then. Maybe I am a slow learner. Even then, despite doing my MA now and having completed all my coursework, I still feel like I am lacking in the liberal Arts education. Could it be that the way "higher education" is structured today leave many students feeling inadequate and half-educated? Was the old system better?
I guess in this age of specialisation, people know more and more about less and less. But then, I seem to encounter people who seem to know less and less about more and more.

What say you?